Tesla’s AWS Is Its Megapack Business
Summary:
- To address any potential confusion immediately, by Tesla’s AWS, I mean that Tesla’s EV business is to Amazon’s book business as Tesla’s Megapack business is to Amazon’s AWS business.
- With that out of the way, it’s worth noting that the most vexing issue that has faced the alternative energy movement has been storage of energy generated from alternative sources.
- It’s been a painfully difficult problem; however, Tesla Megapack has, to at least some degree, solved the problem of utility-scale energy storage with its commercially viable and profitable Megapack platform.
- With this in mind, I believe Tesla Megapack will achieve the quite lofty 1.5K GWh goal that CEO Elon Musk has set for the business in the decade ahead.
- Today, I will illustrate how large Tesla’s Megapack business could become should it achieve 1K and 1.5K GWh annual deployment.
Exploring The Analogy
This is the second installment in a three part series that illustrates, in my estimation, that Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the most asymmetric long term-opportunities among megacap stocks.
I published the first installment and laid the foundation for this installment for you here:
With respect to the Amazon (AMZN) analogies I’ve made, I believe they are valuable for two reasons principally:
- It helps to elucidate why Tesla trades at such a giant premium to its auto-manufacturer peers.
- It provides you a clear picture of the exact lines of business that comprise the Tesla conglomerate.
I do not believe either of these ideas are immediately clear, so, to summarize very briefly, here’s a breakdown of the Tesla conglomerate.
- Tesla’s FSD platform business
- Tesla’s Supercharger network business
- Tesla’s electric vehicle business
And, today, we will review what I believe to be Tesla’s most promising and, in the future, possibly largest line of business:
- Tesla Energy (i.e., its fourth line of business within its conglomerate)
- Specifically, Tesla’s Megapack product
This is arguably the most exciting line of business within the Tesla conglomerate for two reasons:
- Its total addressable market [TAM] is immense, as I will mathematically demonstrate for you today. In this vein, it could be considered Tesla’s “AWS,” to borrow the analogy I used to explore Tesla’s foundational business: its line of electric vehicles, or “books,” as I called them.
- Tesla Energy solves a profoundly difficult problem, which has vexed the alternative energy industry over the last couple decades. Tesla’s Megapack platform, sold by Tesla Energy, represents a watershed moment for utility-scale alternative energy storage, and, as such, its backlog runs into 2025.
With these ideas as our foundation, let’s begin our review of Tesla Energy and its flagship and most promising product: Tesla Megapack.
Tesla Energy: Purveyor Of Megapacks
At the risk of being somewhat redundant, I believe that it should be overemphasized that Tesla Energy is arguably the most important component of the Tesla thesis today outside of the FSD platform’s long term success.
I see so many bearish comments on Tesla related to its EV delivery targets, which I myself have some doubts about, but when I ask these bears about Tesla’s Energy business, they scantly have an idea of what I’m talking about, much less the precise unit economics associated with Tesla Megapack and the degree to which Tesla could scale these unit economics. I will delineate them for you later on.
As I’ve shared in the past, I believe the two hardest problems for humans to solve presently are:
- Using AI to create personalized cancer therapeutics, effectively curing cancer one genome at a time
- Creating a viable utility-scale energy storage product that can support an alternative energy future with bidirectional energy generation within a virtual power plant. (That was a mouthful. There’s a diagram just below that aids in understanding what I just wrote.)
Tesla’s Three-Pronged Energy Future:
- Solar & Wind Energy Generation,
- Utility-Scale Storage,
- And Home Generated Energy,
- All Orchestrated By AI Software
It has often been acknowledged that the most significant impediment to this future has been utility scale energy storage (as well as making solar roofs and home energy generation/storage economically viable. Their current payback period is roughly 10 years, which is a big ask for most folks. It is more economically sensible to simply pay a utility bill presently and not go into $85k worth of debt, even if energy becomes free post that 10-year payback period).
Utility-scale energy storage has vexed the industry for the last two decades; however, as of today, Tesla has fielded a commercially viable, profitable, utility-scale energy storage solution in its Megapack product/platform.
Without much fanfare, Tesla has advanced the alternative energy industry substantially in bringing this product to life globally.
While not perfect, it has seen incredible adoption, and, importantly, it’s a very profitable product, as the chart below demonstrates. Further, it does not need to be perfect. It can evolve and become even more perfected over time, but it needs to be commercially viable on a basic level. Early adopters will help to perfect the product over time by providing financial resources via their purchases, just as they have in purchasing Telsa electric vehicles over the last decade or so.
Tesla Energy (Megapack Product) Becomes More Profitable Than Tesla EVs In Q3 2023
Regarding energy storage, we deployed 4 gigawatt hours of energy of storage products in Q3. And as this business grows, the energy division is becoming our highest margin business. Energy and service now contribute over $0.5 billion to quarterly [gross] profit.
Before we continue, to give you an idea of what we’re discussing here, here are a couple examples:
As you can see, Megapack is the utility-scale energy storage system for which the world has been waiting.
The product is, in a sense, the missing link in the alternative energy future, and I believe that Tesla Megapack is just getting started (note that this is a belief and not a guarantee, though one I believe strongly because I see the reality that grid demand will expand substantially as EV adoption continues, which I noted elsewhere in this review of Tesla Megapack).
Today, Tesla deploys about 4 GWh of storage per quarter at an annualized run rate of 16 GWh; however, the company has repeated consistently that it plans to deploy 1k+ GWh in annual energy storage by 2030.
Martin Viecha: Thank you. And the last investor question is, with near-infinite global demand for energy storage.
Elon Musk: Yes.
Martin Viecha: Where will Tesla build the next Megapack factories? How many are needed on each continent?
Elon Musk: It’s a good question. It’s not something we — I think we’ll provide an update about that in the future, but it is something we’re thinking about very carefully. I really kind of like what is the fastest path to 1,000-gigawatt-hours a year of production. And you’ll see announcements come out later this year and next, that answer that question.
Elon Musk, CEO, Tesla Q4 2022 Earnings Call
Tesla Energy Storage Deployment Growth
Tesla Energy Storage Deployment Growth
After a substantial amount of analysis of the business, I have distilled its unit economics for you below.
The math underlying this business is as follows:
- 1,000 GWh/year in production at $550/kWh (current Megapack unit economic) = $550B in ~25% gross margin energy deployment revenues
- 1,500 GWh/year in production at $550/kWh (current Megapack unit economic) = $825B in ~25% gross margin energy deployment revenues
And this straightforward math is why Mr. Musk has remarked:
It [Tesla Energy Megapack] could be bigger, but it will certainly be of a similar magnitude.
Elon Musk on 2019 Earnings Call
Notably, Mr. Musk has also remarked that the business could achieve margins of 60%+ in the past (of course, this is conjecture on his part, and it remains to be seen), so it cannot be perfectly discerned at present as to where the upward trajectory of Tesla Energy’s gross margins will reach their asymptotic limit.
While We Can’t Be Sure Where Tesla’s Energy Gross Margins Will Land, They’ve Been Ascending Rapidly
The business is very simple, and the above-illustrated math represents the basic unit economics of the business. There’s really not much more to say about it, though it certainly need be said, as I see so many folks commenting on the valuation of Tesla without fully appreciating the various lines of business and their possible unit economics.
Am I preaching Gospel to you today? Of course not, and I think we have all divined that.
But, in the interest of providing to you an explanation as to why Tesla would be valued so richly, this basic math gives you greater context.
To close this section, for your edification, we can see Tesla Energy’s revenues and cost of goods sold below.
Valuation Exercise: How Much Could Tesla Energy Be Worth Long Term?
As we did for electric vehicles and Tesla’s FSD platform, let’s now perform a valuation exercise for Tesla Energy whereby we determine, via a sum of the parts valuation exercise, what the entire Tesla business could be worth long term and correspondingly what returns we may generate in purchasing it at about $650B in enterprise value, which is where it trades today.
To perform this valuation exercise, I will leverage the data I’ve shared with you thus far with which I will populate my valuation model’s assumptions.
Assumptions:
TTM 12-month revenue [A] |
$6.24 billion |
Potential Free Cash Flow Margin [B] (conservative) |
15% |
Average diluted shares outstanding [C] |
3.48 billion |
Free cash flow per share [D = (A * B) / C] |
$.27 |
Free cash flow per share growth rate (results in 922 GWh by yr 10) |
50% |
Terminal growth rate |
3% |
Years of elevated growth |
10 |
Total years to stimulate |
100 |
Discount Rate (Our “Next Best Alternative”) |
9.8% |
- Note that I used a placeholder share price of $100/share. As you know, we’re not valuing the entire Tesla conglomerate here; instead, we’re only valuing Tesla Energy; specifically, its Megapack product.
As we can see, Tesla Energy could be worth $449.79/share by 2033, which represents an enterprise value of $1.565T.
Today, the entire Tesla conglomerate trades at about $234/share and $710B in enterprise value.
And, remember, this is just one line of business among:
- Tesla’s FSD platform business
- Tesla’s Supercharger network business
- Tesla’s electric vehicle business
Concluding Thoughts
I believe this growth represents the exciting prospect that Tesla Energy, and specifically its Megapack product, may, indeed, be seen as Tesla’s AWS over the long run.
The unit economics are there. The global demand is there and will continue to grow, especially as demand on the electrical grid increases massively alongside EV adoption (which is often something that bears or skeptics miss in their calculations of how large this business could become).
Today, in the same way that AWS generated about $6B in 2015, Tesla Energy could be ready to scale parabolically in the decade ahead.
AWS Sales Growth Below (Tesla Energy Currently Generates ~$6B In 25% Gross Margin Sales On 16 GWh/year. Tesla Believes It Will Produce 1,000 GWh Annually In Energy Storage Deployments)
Risks
The central risk to the Megapack thesis revolves around Tesla’s ability to execute. For instance, while Cybertruck is an attractive product, it will take a decade for some folks to receive the orders they are placing today.
Another risk would be lower cost producers achieving quality and reliability parity with Tesla’s Megapack product.
Thank you for reading, and have a great day.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of TSLA, AMZN either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.