Making Sense Of Microsoft’s $3.1 Trillion Market Cap (Rating Downgrade)

Summary:

  • Microsoft’s current valuation requires a revenue CAGR of 20% over the next 8 years, maintaining margins and free cash flow conversion at current levels.
  • In a Bear-Case scenario, Microsoft is overvalued by 38%, while in a Bull-Case scenario, it could be undervalued by 9%.
  • Achieving the necessary growth rates seems challenging, given Microsoft’s already dominant market positions in key segments like Productivity, Cloud, and Gaming.

Microsoft France headquarters entrance in Issy les Moulineaux near Paris

Jean-Luc Ichard

Microsoft is (NASDAQ:MSFT) currently trading at a valuation of almost $3.1 trillion, making it the 3rd biggest stock after Apple (AAPL) and Nvidia (NVDA).

When looking at traditional valuation, like the PE ratio for example, the

Research Firm Expectation p.a. Time Frame
Mordor Intelligence 16.4% 2024 – 2029
Grand View Research 21.2% 2024 – 2030
Markets and Markets 15.1% 2024 – 2028
Fortune Business Insights 16.5% 2024 – 2032
Acumen Research 17.8% 2023 – 2032
Statista 18.5% 2024 – 2029

Windows Gaming Ads Devices
Bear p.a. 5% 10% 10% 5%
Market p.a. 8.0% 13.1% 15.5% 8.0%
Bull p.a. 10% 15% 20% 10%
Weighting (as of Q4/24) 37% 35% 20% 8%


Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of MSFT either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *